Residents’ 290 million class action lawsuit against the fate of the Freedom Convoy is aimed right now at silencing individual lawyers.
Residents’ 290 million class action lawsuit against the fate of the Freedom Convoy is aimed right now at silencing individual lawyers.
Lawyers for the defendants say the lawsuit filed by a group of Ottawa residents against the Freedom Convoy’s fate is designed to silence expression.
The May Day class action lawsuit by Ottawa resident Sexy Lee and others is seeking $290 million in damages alleging that the satellite performed actions.And the psychological crisis as well as the closure of businesses in the city of Ottawa led to the loss of nannies.
Lawyer for Car Accidents :- Click
The lawsuit also names citizens who donated to the protests, according to a news release from the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF).Who are supporting legal representation per video.
Lawyers for defendant Tamara Leak Crush Bar and others will appear in court on December 14 to try to hush up the case They say it is a strategic lawsuit against public participation Or a lawsuit brought to silence opponents.
Jackie Lee’s lawsuit serves the purpose the anti-SLAPP statute was created to address, attorney James Mention said in the release.
Attempts to silence peaceful expressions and the defendants’ right to participate in public debate.
GCC F said donating to and participating in the Freedom Convoy is an expression of support for the protest and an expression of disinterest in the Government of Canada’s response to COVID which is a matter of public concern.
now at silencing individual lawyers.in usa
Bhaiya also says that the defendants have a Veda defense and the value of expression on the issue is much greater than the nuisance charges against them.
The GCC F stated that once an anti-SLAPP motion is filed, the defendant must demonstrate that the lawsuit against them arises out of their expression and is related to a matter of public interest.
If the defendant can demonstrate that their expression relates to a matter of public interest, the plaintiff must demonstrate that their case has sufficient merit.And the defendant has no defense
The group behind the lawsuit launched a website where they say they are seeking immunity for the severe damages and losses experienced by residents, businesses and workers in Ottawa.
Non-stop music, diesel fumes, unexpected fireworks and loud music disturb residents’ ease of sanity in their own homes.
Canada is a free and democratic society with a long tradition of peaceful protest and the disposition of defendants to cause serious harm to other innocent bystanders in pursuit of their misguided political agenda.have abused freedom for.
Ms Layne’s protests have made life difficult It was difficult to survive as a farmer, she testified in court testimony in October.
